Lost money when Polymarket’s “US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 30” market resolved “Yes”? Burwick Law is reviewing claims. Contact digitalassets@burwick.law.

NEW YORK, November 11, 2026. Burwick Law represents Polymarket traders in disputes over market resolutions. Burwick Law has filed lawsuits in New York on behalf of Polymarket traders, including lawsuits concerning Polymarket’s US x Iran permanent peace deal market. Burwick Law is reviewing additional claims from traders who lost money when the June 30 market resolved “Yes.”

Polymarket ran a group of markets asking whether the United States and Iran would agree to a permanent peace deal by a stated date. One market set the date at June 30, 2026, at 11:59 PM ET. The published rules defined a permanent peace deal as an agreement that explicitly indicates that military hostilities between the United States and Iran have ended or will permanently cease. The published rules stated that an agreement that is explicitly temporary does not qualify. The published rules named official information from the governments of the United States and Iran as the primary resolution source.

On or about June 14 and 15, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a memorandum of understanding. Public reporting stated that the memorandum of understanding included a 60-day period to negotiate a final agreement. On June 17, 2026, President Trump described the agreement as a memorandum of understanding. CTech reported in July 2026 that attacks continued after the memorandum of understanding.

The June 30 market resolved “Yes.” “No” shares paid nothing. The question for traders in the June 30 market is whether a memorandum of understanding with a 60-day negotiation period is a permanent peace deal under the published rules. CTech reported total trading volume of $478.91 million across all of the dates in the US x Iran permanent peace deal market.

Burwick Law is seeking to speak with (1) traders who held “No” shares in the June 30 market when it resolved, and (2) traders who sold “No” shares at a loss before the June 30 market resolved. The size of the position does not matter. Traders outside the United States can contact Burwick Law. Traders who also held a position in the June 15 market should say so.

Legal claims are subject to time limits. Traders should keep their records, including transaction history, account or wallet information, and copies of the market page and its rules. Each trader’s circumstances differ and can affect that trader’s claim.

Polymarket traders who lost money in the June 30 market can contact digitalassets@burwick.law. Please include the side you held, the approximate number of shares, and your purchase and sale dates.

Attorney Advertising. This article is based on the markets’ published rules and public reporting. Allegations in any complaint are allegations only, and no court has determined that Polymarket, UMA, or any other party acted unlawfully in connection with these markets. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship unless and until an engagement agreement is signed.

‍