Lost money when Polymarket’s “US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 15” market resolved “Yes”? Burwick Law is reviewing claims. Contact digitalassets@burwick.law.
Polymarket traders who held “No” shares in the “US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 15, 2026” market, or who sold “No” shares at a loss while the outcome was disputed, can contact digitalassets@burwick.law.
NEW YORK, November 11, 2026. Burwick Law represents Polymarket traders in disputes over market resolutions. Burwick Law has filed lawsuits in New York on behalf of Polymarket traders, including lawsuits concerning Polymarket’s US x Iran permanent peace deal market. Burwick Law is reviewing additional claims from traders who lost money when the June 15 market resolved “Yes.”
Polymarket ran a group of markets asking whether the United States and Iran would agree to a permanent peace deal by a stated date. One market set the date at June 15, 2026, at 11:59 PM ET. The published rules defined a permanent peace deal as an agreement that explicitly indicates that military hostilities between the United States and Iran have ended or will permanently cease. The published rules stated that an agreement that is explicitly temporary does not qualify. The published rules named official information from the governments of the United States and Iran as the primary resolution source.
On or about June 14 and 15, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a memorandum of understanding. Public reporting stated that the memorandum of understanding included a 60-day period to negotiate a final agreement. On June 17, 2026, President Trump described the agreement as a memorandum of understanding. CTech reported that traders in the June 15 market said no formal signing took place by the June 15 deadline.
The outcome of the June 15 market was disputed through UMA, the token-holder voting system Polymarket uses for contested markets. UMA token holders voted “Yes,” and the June 15 market resolved “Yes.” “No” shares paid nothing. CTech reported trading volume of $177.37 million in the June 15 market.
Burwick Law is seeking to speak with (1) traders who held “No” shares in the June 15 market when it resolved, and (2) traders who sold “No” shares at a loss while the outcome was disputed. The size of the position does not matter. Traders outside the United States can contact Burwick Law.
Legal claims are subject to time limits. Traders should keep their records, including transaction history, account or wallet information, and copies of the market page and its rules. Each trader’s circumstances differ and can affect that trader’s claim.
Polymarket traders who lost money in the June 15 market can contact digitalassets@burwick.law. Please include the side you held, the approximate number of shares, and your purchase and sale dates.
Attorney Advertising. This article is based on the markets’ published rules and public reporting. Allegations in any complaint are allegations only, and no court has determined that Polymarket, UMA, or any other party acted unlawfully in connection with these markets. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship unless and until an engagement agreement is signed.